« green jimmy choos | Main | book proposal »

kate moss

May 11, 2007

On my recent visit to London, I checked out the new Kate Moss for Top Shop range and after the frenzy surrounding the launch, I was positively underwhelmed. Grungy looking waistcoats? Jackets with arms so skinny you’d need a cocaine-physique to stand a fighting chance of getting into them? Cocktail dresses in cheap polyester? It might be fashion heresy to say so but three words sprang to mind: Emperor’s. New. Clothes. Kate herself has far too much style to wear much of this cheap tat.

But then I have never really understood the Top Shop phenomenon. With the exception of a denim jacket bought six years ago, I do not own anything from the place. This is partly – like not shopping at Tesco – a matter of principle. Philip Green relies partly on the British workforce for his billions but, because he hides out in Monaco for most of the year, is not obliged to pay into the communal tax kitty.

Secondly, I can’t help thinking that Top Shop - and Primark’s - pile-it-it-high, sell-it-cheap approach to fashion sits uneasily with these ecologically-concerned times. Personally, I would rather buy less, but choose things that I will wear for a long time, than throw away a few pounds on a polyester frock that is on a fast-track to landfill. Despite all the euphoric press coverage, I can never find anything in Top Shop that does not look cheap and ill-fitting. My advice is to leave it to the skinny teenagers. The real insider secret of the moment is Jaeger London. Since its makeover, you cannot move in the Regent Street store for fashion editors buying well-cut, bang-on-trend items - though curiously they choose not to rave on about it to their readers.

comments (3)

1. Posted by Bella Jowett on May 17, 2007 1:14 PM

God, I couldn't agree more. This is what I've been preaching to my friends for some time. Top Shop sells badly made tat.

Moving on to Kate Moss. Let's face it, she's not pretty, not that talented and, from what I've heard, not that nice. Why is everyone so obsessed with her. It's only because she doesn't do interviews. If she did, nobody would probably be interested in her anymore.


2. Posted by Scentfreak on May 18, 2007 4:15 PM

Never does interviews aye? Not surprised. Have you ever spoken to her? I did once and I honestly thought she was a knocked up pregnant 16 year old chav until someone pointed out who I was talking to.


3. Posted by Lisa on August 4, 2009 8:57 AM

Ha Ha, that was so funny - but not surprising!


post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)